Met has recently announced a wide-scale overhaul of its content moderation policies. The overhaul is the response to years of criticism about spreading misinformation on issues that are politically or health-related.
Meta’s new approach emphasizes giving users greater freedom and will focus its moderation efforts on the most severe violations.
Meta’s Move Away from Fact-Checking and Towards Community Notes
Meta’s Radical Overhaul: Free Speech Over Fact-Checking, Personalized Political Feeds
Dima Solomin/Unsplash
Meta is discontinuing its third-party fact-checking program and replacing it with a new model called Community Notes. In its latest blog, it’s stated that it’s somewhat similar to what X.com, formerly known as Twitter, uses to evaluate content through user contributions.
The idea is to make the process more transparent, relying less on external organizations and more on community input. This change may be criticized for potential bias, but Meta is banking on it being a more scalable solution to fight misinformation while still enabling users to engage in meaningful dialogue.
Read More:
CES 2025: AMD Brings High-Powered Laptops With Ryzen AI Max Chips For Gamers
Relaxed Moderation on Mainstream Topics
Another important change in Meta’s content moderation policy is its new policy on mainstream discussion. Instead of enforcing strict policies on matters of politics or health, Meta would enforce mainly the illegal and high-severity violations related to terrorism, child sexual exploitation, drugs, fraud, and scams. This change reduces the over-reach of content moderation and brings in a range of opinions and discussions, especially with politically charged matters.
With this adjustment, Meta will let users take more control over the content they see, creating a more personalized experience that reflects their interests.
Critics are concerned that this may lead to the creation of “echo chambers” where users are only exposed to opinions that resonate with them, but others believe it is an important step toward free expression in the digital age.
Encouraging Personalization of Political Content
Perhaps the most contentious aspect of Meta’s new content moderation policy is its approach to political content. Rather than strict guidelines around political posts and discussions, Meta has decided to personalize users’ feeds, allowing them to see content that aligns with their preferences.
This may drastically transform the nature of political conversations occurring on Meta platforms as users come to encounter increased levels of bias that favor a user’s existing belief system rather than balanced viewpoints.
This is also a signal that Meta is likely to respond to increasing calls for more diverse political opinions, especially after it faced criticism for past censorship practices.
Therefore, Meta is likely to play the card of free speech and resurface from emerging calls for less stringent content policies and space for individual expression, TechCrunch reports.
Meta, Politics, and The Embracing End
Such trends are significant, especially with last year’s United States presidential election and a change in Meta’s political landscape. Over the last few years, Meta has been criticized for its policy, including the ban placed on former U.S. President Donald Trump.
Yet, with a new leadership team and political climate, the company appears to be recalibrating its approach toward content moderation.
Recently appointed Global Affairs Chief, Joel Kaplan, is a conservative politico, so he is moving this shift forward. The Meta leadership has transformed significantly under Kaplan; it appears very interested in conforming to the changing political tides, where there is increased interest in reaching out to the new administration.
Meta’s Oversight Board
Meta’s Oversight Board has publicly supported these changes, acknowledging that they could enhance trust and encourage free speech. The Board views the shift as a positive step toward refining the company’s approach to content moderation and is expected to collaborate with Meta on shaping a more balanced free speech policy in 2025.
Not only is Meta in the process of changing content moderation, but the company is also restructuring internally. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has signaled his desire to be closer to the political figures, particularly those from the conservative camp.
Meta recently added UFC head Dana White to its board as a signal that it is further aligning with the incoming political establishment. As if this weren’t enough, it has also decided to shift content policy and trust teams out of California to Texas and other parts of the U.S., further in line with Meta’s move to embrace diverse political perspectives.
Related Article:
Instagram DMs Scheduled Messages Is Now Available — Here’s How to Time Your Chats